Tuesday, 23 December 2008

Cheech & Chong's Nice Dreams

Cheech & Chong's Nice DreamsStudio: Sony Pictures Home Ent Release Date: 05/22/2007 Run time: 88 minutes Rating: R

Customer Review: Hilarious!!

This was my favorite of all the Cheech and Chong movies.

You cannot watch this one and not laugh! The concept of selling weed as popsicles from an ice cream truck?? SOOO Funny!!

Customer Review: Strange, surreal, hilarious, another great directorial effort by Thomas Chong...

I recently went through Cheech and Chong's catalog, specifically films directed by Chong himself. As I was watching Next Movie, this film, and Still Smokin', I noticed that all these films have a strange, surreal, laid back, leisurely style. Part of me wants to say that Tommy Chong was just stoned out of his mind when he directed these films (which he probably was), but I can't help but notice that the films (especially Next Movie and this one) have a flow unique to themselves. The pacing seems deliberate, there are many long takes in the film (including one when Cheech, Chong, and a dealer are at the dealer's house, and Cheech is burning tortillas while Chong is getting stoned), and the film seems to be deliberately made that way. It doesn't feel like a happy accident.



Nice Dreams is also a very funny film. It is also downright surreal at times with the dealer's "garden" and Stacy Keach slowly turning into a lizard while smoking the best grass anywhere. Cheech and Chong's "whales" song is pretty good, too. Even though pot use in movies is more common now, Cheech and Chong were the only ones doing it back in their day. Cheech and Chong just did it, they were never self conscious about getting stoned all day and making money off of it.



I am going to go out on a limb and say Chong has a directorial style all his own. I'd like to see him make another film. He hasn't directed one since Far Out Man, which was made sometime in the 1990's. Nice Dreams is a very good film. It's not as hilarious as Up in Smoke or Next Movie, but it's still very good.
See details

0 comments: